1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 8069 and 8070 of 2022 Date of Decision : 24.02.2025 1. CWP No. 8069 of 2022 Kapil Dev …… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P and ors. ……Respondents. 2. CWP No. 8070 of 2022 Kapil Dev …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P and ors. ….Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate in both the petitions. For Respondents No.1 and 2 : Mr. Navlesh Verma, Additional Advocate General. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Goverdhan Lal Sharma, Advocate. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral) Since, the work in question has been completed, therefore, we leave it open to the petitioner(s) to avail such remedy, as is available to him under, the law, including and not limited to the assailing of tender in favour of respondent No.3 and consequently the proceedings for award of damages, if any. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2 It is also made clear that non-granting of interim relief at the initial stage shall not be construed to be a circumstance adverse to the petitioner(s) or in favour of the respondents. 3. Accordingly, both the petitions stand disposed of alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge ( Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 24th February, 2025 (ravinder/pathania)