APHC010273002020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18023/2020 Between: 1. M RAVI BABU, MOGILI RAVI BABU, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC DOCTOR, R/O. DOOR NO.3-29-60/B, 2ND LANE, KRISHNA NAGAR, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PATTABHIPURAM POLICE STATION, PATTABHIPURAM, GUNTUR. 4. PURNACHANDRA RAO, , CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATTABHIPURAM POLICE STATION, PATTABHIPURAM, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the 4th respondent in the capacity of the 3rd respondent in acting upon the complaint of the petitioner dt. 01.09.2020 forwarded by the 2nd respondent in conducting preliminary enquiry, registering or investigating or refusing or referring it as a 2 false case on the grouse and ground that the petitioner made an allegations against the police people in the complaint lodged by the petitioner is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of the Fundamental Principles enshrined under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent in the capacity of the 3rd respondent act upon the complaint dt. 01.09.2020 lodged by the petitioner which has been forwarded by the 2nd respondent as per law, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent in the capacity of the 3rd respondent to forthwith act upon the complaint dt. 01.09.2020 lodged by the petitioner which has been forwarded by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the 4th respondent in the capacity of the 3rd respondent in acting upon the complaint of the petitioner dt. 01.09.2020 forwarded by the 2nd respondent in conducting preliminary enquiry, registering or investigating or refusing or referring it as a false case on the grouse and ground that the petitioner made an allegations against the police people in the complaint lodged by the petitioner is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of the Fundamental Principles enshrined under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent in the capacity of the 3rd respondent act upon the complaint dt. 01.09.2020 lodged by the petitioner which has been forwarded by the 2nd respondent as per law, and pass...…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that crime has been registered against the unofficial respondent and the investigation is pending. 4. Recording the submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.08.2025 MH 4 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 97 W.P.No.18023 of 2020 Dated: 13.08.2025 MH