HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26368 of 2025 Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1.Vide order dated 01.08.2025, notice was issued to first informant of the case. Office vide its report dated 08.10.2025 has reported that notice issued to the first informant of the case haws been served personally. 2. List revised. None appears for the informant inspite of service of notice upon the first informant of the case. 3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Bharti Kashyap, learned counsel for the C.W.C., learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the role of the applicant is standing outside the place and that the main accused Gaurav against whom allegation of rape has been levelled has already been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.08.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 28393 of 2025, copy of which order has been produced before this Court and is taken on record. Learned counsel further argued that the case of the applicant stands on better footing and therefore the applicant is also entitled for bail. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 18.05.2025. 5. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the Child Welfare Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Bharti Kashyap, G.A. Manjeet .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Committee have vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that in case the applicant is released on bail he will misuse the liberty of bail, however, could not dispute the submissions of learned counsel for the applicant with regard to parity. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 7. Let the applicant Manjeet be released on bail in Case Crime No. 127 of 2025 under Section 70(2) of B.N.S. and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, 2012, Police Station Jasrana, District Firozabad, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 8. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant in accordance with law. October 16, 2025 S.Ali BAIL No. 26368 of 2025 2 (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad