EHTASHAMUDDIN AHMAD FARUQI v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/35238/2025 · 2025-10-13
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35238 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.
1. Heard Ms. Anura Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner wants writ of mandamus to command the respondent No.- 3 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 22nd July, 2025.
3. Upon perusal of the representation we find that there is some dispute between private parties relating to the possession and right to enjoyment in respect of the property in question by the petitioner claims to be not covered under the decree obtained by the brother of the petitioner from civil court, whereas the other parties are creating confusion in the matter on the spot.
4. In our considered view, petitioner may also institute a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction and may also obtain temporary injunction during the pendency of the suit in the event petitioner is of the view that his land is not covered under the decree passed by the civil court.
5. Subject to aforesaid liberty, petition is consigned to records. October 14, 2025 Atmesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anura Singh, Prateek Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Ehtashamuddin Ahmad Faruqi .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ATMESH KESARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad