Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19459 (HP)

MEGHNA BHARDWAJ v. VIBHORE BHARDWAJ

CMPMO/923/2019 · 2025-08-18

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:HHC:27811 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 923 of 2019 Decided on: 18.08.2025 Smt. Meghna Bhardwaj … Petitioner Versus Sh. Vibhore Bhardwaj … Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate. For the respondent : Ex parte. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Despite repeated calls, as none is appearing for the respondent, accordingly, he is proceeded against ex parte. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the order passed by learned District Judge (Family Court), Shimla, in terms whereof, an application filed by her under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act was rejected on the ground that in terms the statement made by the petitioner on oath on 01.06.2019 before the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (CBI), Shimla, she has accepted the maintenance to the tune of Rs. 37,000/- per month for herself and for her children and stated that she shall not be claiming any further amount other than the settled amount. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:27811 3. Taking into consideration the fact that this order was passed in the year 2019, on the basis of statement made by the petitioner in the proceedings, which were initiated by her under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as was stated at the bar by learned Counsel for the petitioner, these proceedings are disposed of with the observation that an endeavour be made by learned Court below to decide the petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act expeditiously and the petitioner is at liberty to again file an appropriate application, seeking maintenance/ enhanced maintenance, in lieu of the time lapse and the order passed by learned Court below, which is assailed by way of this petition, shall not come in the way of the learned Court below in passing appropriate order thereupon in the changed circumstances. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 18, 2025 (narender)