SANTLAL v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION AND 5 ORS.
WRIC/22727/2014 · 2025-10-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194583 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194583 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 22727 of 2014 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Case called out in the revised list. Although Sri Madan Mohan, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents is present, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated. October 16, 2025 Arun K. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Singh, Vinod Kuamr Rakesh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aushim Luthra, Manoj Kumar Yadav (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Santlal .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Administration And 5 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad