APHC010273212025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3299] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1896/2025 Between: 1. DATLA SRINIVASA RAJU, S/O D.V.P. RAJU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, BUSINEES, R/O. FLAT NO. 104, RAJITHA APARTMENT, RAJIV NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 2. UADDARAJU VENKATA SATYA SURYA SUBRAHMANYAM RAJU, S/O SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED 55 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/O. NARASIMHAPURAM VILLAGE, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DATLA SITARAMA RAJU, , S/O. VENKATA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. CHERUKUMILLI VILLAGE, AKIVEEDU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. M RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. ATCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. PHB COLONY, HIG-15 BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. PLAINTIFF NO.4 3. M/S GAYATRI MARINE PRODUCTS PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.K. ANNAPURNA W/O. D. SIVARAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT OCC BUSINESS, R/O. PLOT NO.1242/B, ROAD NO.62, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD. (DEFENDANT) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to direct the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Machilipatnam, Krishna District in not disposing Interlocutory Application in I.A.No. 142 of 2024 in I.A.No.7 of 2018 in I.A.No.7 of 2017 in O.S.No. 2 OF 2017 preferably within three months and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1896/2025 ORDER: Heard Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The petitioners in the present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.2 of 2017 in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Krishna, Machilipatnam. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in I.A.No.7 of 2017 temporary injunction was granted. He further submits that the defendants in the suit violated the interim injunction order. Consequently, I.A.No.7 of 2018 was filed under Order 39 Rule 2A of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) to punish them for the said violation. As there was no representation from the plaintiffs’ side, the application was dismissed for default on 13.09.2023. For recall of the said order dated 13.09.2023, the plaintiffs filed I.A.No.142 of 2024. 4. The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed being aggrieved from non disposal of I.A.No.142 of 2024. The said application was filed on 15.02.2024. Therefore, the application is pending for last more than one year. 5. Under these circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, providing that I.A.No.142 of 2024 will be considered in accordance with law, expeditiously. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not observed anything on merits of I.A.No.142 of 2024 either way. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J Dated: 01.08.2025 AG 34 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1896/2025 Dated: 01.08.2025 AG