Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194546 (ALL)

SARJEET CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/35218/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35218 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Satish Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nand Lal Maurya, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State- respondents. Present petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent No.2-Naib Tehsildar Barauni, Tehsil Gabhana, District Aligarh, to decide Case No.2422/2025 (Computerized Case No.T202518020402422) (Sushila Devi vs. Savjeet Chauhan) under Section 34 of the U P Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously and within a stipulated time period. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition to point out that although several dates have been fixed but for some reason or the other, matter has been adjourned. The delay in disposal of the case is stated to be causing hardship to the petitioner. Accordingly, a prayer is made for a direction to respondent No.2, to conclude the proceedings at an early date. Having regard to the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that respondent No.2-Naib Tehsildar Barauni, Tehsil Gabhana, District Aligarh, would make an endeavor to conclude the proceedings of the case, which is stated to be pending before it, preferably within a period of three months, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment. October 14, 2025 RKK/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Sarjeet Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad