HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35465 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1, Sri A.P. Paul, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, Sri Vijay Bahadur Maurya, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 and Ms. Arti Raje, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "1). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to provide water connection and transfer house tax and water tax in the petitioner's name from the date of possession of property i.e. 15.06.2017. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed representation dated 05.03.2024 before respondent No. 3, but till date no decision has been taken. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No. 3 to decide the aforesaid representation within a stipulated time. 4. Sri Vijay Bahadur Maurya, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 submitted that representation of petitioner is totally vague and it is having no substance. He next submitted that petitioner may be directed to file a fresh representation and in case any such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided at the earliest. 5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Om Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajay Prakash Paul, Arti Raje, C.S.C., Harsh Vardhan Gupta, Vijay Bahadur Maurya Smt. Shabanam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) disposed of with liberty to petitioner to move fresh representation along with certified copy of this order before respondent No.3 within two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed, respondent No. 3 is directed to decide the same in accordance with law maximum within a period of six weeks thereafter. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 3 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. October 17, 2025 ADY WRIC No. 35465 of 2025 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad