HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36367 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority is not issuing character certificate in favour of the petitioner. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, District Mau, within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. October 17, 2025 Virendra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Upadhyay, Ambrish Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Tripti Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad