Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19453 (GAU)

KAMAL UPADHAYA @ KESHAB UPADHAYA and ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Crl.Pet./398/2015 · 2025-05-20

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010211282015 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./398/2015 KAMAL UPADHAYA @ KESHAB UPADHAYA and ANR S/O LT. RABILAL UPADHAYA VILL- RADHALA, P.S. ULUWONI, P.O. BEGENAATI, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM- 782138. 2: SMT. SUMITRA DEVI D/O SRI KAMAL UPADHAYA VILL- RADHALA P.S. ULUWONI P.O. BEGENAATI DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN - 782138 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR 2:SRI SUDHIR KUMAR PODDAR PROPRIETOR M/S DURGAPUR AGARTALA TRANSPORT COMPANY BEHARBARI P.O. and P.S. BASISTHA GUWAHATI- 781037 DIS.T KAMRUP M ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.U DAS, MR.B CHAKRAVARTY,MR.K DHAR,MS.S SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : , PP, ASSAM,, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Page No.# 2/2 Date : 21 .05. 2025 The learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. B. Chakravarty submits that the first petitioner, Sri Kamal Upadhayay @ Keshab Upadhayay has already expired. According to Mr. Chakravarty, the second petitioner, Smti Sumitra Devi has already got married and they have stopped keeping contact with Mr. Chakravarty. Heard Ms. N. Das, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the State respondent No. 1. Considering the circumstances, the matter is not proceeding any further and the same stands accordingly closed. The interim order passed earlier stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant