Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194524 (ALL)

KALPANA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/15165/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15165 of 2025 (Leading Application) WRIT - A No. - 15166 of 2025 (Connected Application) Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. On the oral request of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, he is permitted to implead Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Service Selection Commission, U.P., Lucknow as fifth respondent in leading and connected petitions. 2. Heard Sri Anant Vijay, learned counsel for the petitioner in the leading and connected petitions and learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents and Shri Siddharth Singhal, counsel for respondent no. 2. 3. The counsel for the rival parties have made a joint statement that they do not propose to file any further affidavits thus with the consent of the parties, the leading and connected petitions writ petitions are being decided at the fresh stage 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Service Selection Commission had issued a notification for filling up of the post of 9212 health workers on 15.12.2021. The writ petitioner in the leading and connected writ petition claim to be fully eligible and qualified in all respects and had applied pursuant to the main examination was held on 08.05.2022 and the results were also declared on 27.05.2022 and for Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anant Vijay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Siddharth Singhal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anant Vijay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Siddharth Singhal Kalpana Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Km. Shimlesh Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) document verification, the writ petitioner was called. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that their results has not been declared despite the fact that the claim is to be selected. 5. Shri Siddharth Singhal who appears for the Commission submit that the fifth respondent, Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Service Selection Commission, U.P., Lucknow shall take an appropriate decision as he has to examine the matter at the first instance. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. 7. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 8. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the leading and connected petitions are being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self-attested copy of the leading and connected petitions before the fifth respondent, who shall on the receipt of the same by 31.10.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. In case the fifth respondent is of the opinion that the matter is to be decided by some other authorities then the papers shall be transmitted to the same. 9. Needless to point out that the leading and connected petitions has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case. 10. With the aforesaid observation, the leading and connected petitions stand disposed off. October 14, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 15165 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad