HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32582 of 2025 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri N.K. Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present bail application has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 254 of 2025, under Sections 111, 178, 179 and 180 B.N.S., Police Station- Khaga, District- Fatehpur during pendency of the trial. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. False recovery of counterfeit currency of Rs.2500/- and a mobile phone has been shown from the applicant. There is no independent witness to the alleged recovery. The applicant does not have any criminal history. It is next contended that the applicant is not a member of any organized crime syndicate nor he acted on behalf of such syndicate. The applicant is in jail since 7.7.2025. In case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having heard counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this Court prima facie finds that there is no independent witness to the alleged recovery. At this stage, there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence. Further the applicant has presently remained confined for more than three months and there is no hope of early conclusion of trial, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd Faizyab Rahamani, Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nausad @ Chunnu @ Nausad Ahmad .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) more so when no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witness, without commenting on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. 6. Let the applicant, Nausad @ Chunnu @ Nausad Ahmad involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that: i. the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; ii. the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witness; iii. the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. October 13, 2025 S.S. BAIL No. 32582 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad