Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19719 WP NO.6605 OF 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.6605 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
SMT. KEMPAMMA W/O LATE R.T. CHALUVEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT JAKKASANDRA VILLAGE, MARALAWADI HOBLI, HAROHALLI TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT - 572 159. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJU S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE TAHSILDAR HAROHALLI TALUK, HAROHALLI, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 572 159. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2-TAHSILDAR, HAROHALLI TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT TO CONSIDER THE
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19719 WP NO.6605 OF 2025
REPRESENTATION DATED 02ND SEPTEMBER, 2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-K; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2-TAHSILDAR, HAROHALLI TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT TO MUTATE THE NAME OF PETITIONER IN COLUMN NO.9 AND 12 OF THE RTC AND FURTHER DIRECT TO ISSUE THE RECORD OF RIGHTS (RTC) IN THE NAME OF PETITIONER; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER
In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 02nd September, 2024 (Annexure-K) for effecting Khata in favour of the petitioner in respect of the land in question in terms of the
judgment and decree dated 16th July, 2024 passed in Original Suit No.367 of 2019 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC., Kanakapura; inter alia sought for direction to respondent No.2 to mutate the name of the petitioner in column No.9 and 12 of the RTC and issue the RTC in the name of the petitioner.
2. Heard Sri. Raju S., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Siddharth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19719 WP NO.6605 OF 2025
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into consideration the averments made in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, respondent No.2-Tahsildar is directed to consider the representation dated 02nd September, 2024 (Annexure-K) at the earliest. It is made clear that, if the respondent No.2- Tahsildar requires any additional documents from the petitioner, same shall be called for by the respondent No.2 from the petitioner at the earliest. The said exercise of
consideration of the representation of petitioner shall be completed by the respondent No.2, within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65