HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36904 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Pratik J. Nagar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 and 5. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he does not want to press the present petition, therefore, same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek appropriate remedy available under The Electricity Act, 2003 read with The Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, which is not objected by Sri Pratik J. Nagar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. October 29, 2025 ADY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R S Dubey, Rajesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pratik J. Nagar (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Shyamwati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad