Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194505 (ALL)

GANESH KUMAR v. SMT. BRAJ LATA AND 4 OTHERS

A227/12432/2025 · 2025-10-12

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12432 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mathura to decide the interim injunction application (Paper No.-7C) filed by the plaintiff- petitioner in Original Suit No.989 of 2023, Ganesh Kumar Vs. Smt. Braj Lata and others, within stipulated period. 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (7C Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Mathura to consider and decide the interim injunction application (7C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajaj Ahmad, Akhtar Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ganesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Braj Lata And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) October 13, 2025 Radhika A227 No. 12432 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad