IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8781 of 2024 Date of Decision: 07.03.2025 _______________________________________________________ Bhartendu Bhardwaj …….Petitioner Versus Union of India & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Janak Raj, Advocate vice Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Once, it is quite apparent from the perusal of order dated 24th October, 2024 passed by Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.301 of 2024, titled as Bhartendu Bhardwaj vs. Union of India and others that petition at hand having been filed by the petitioner has been allowed, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Through, instant petition challenge came to be laid to order dated 12.07.2024, whereby petitioner was transferred to a school, where no NCC troops were functioning. Since petitioner apart from his being Lecturer in Physics, was also a trained Associate NCC Officer(ANO), he could not have been transferred to school not having NCC troops. Being aggrieved on account of refusal to grant interim relief by learned Single Judge, petitioner filed LPA, as detailed hereinabove. Division Bench of this Court having taken note of the fact that petitioner apart from his being Lecturer in Physics is also trained NCC officer, quashed the impugned transfer order dated 12.07.2024. While passing the judgment dated 24th October, 2024, Division Bench of this Court also allowed the writ petition. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and accordingly present petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous alongwith pending applications, if any. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge March 07, 2025 (shankar)