Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194485 (ALL)

MADAN PAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/447/2021 · 2025-10-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 447 of 2021 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicant. Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned counsel for C.B.I. is present. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in F.I.R. No. RC 1202019A0008 dated 24.12.2019, under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) P.C. Act, Police Station Ghaziabad C.B.I. A.C.B., District Ghaziabad with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail during trial. 3. The instant anticipatory bail application is pending since 04.01.2021 i.e. for last more than four and half years, therefore, it reflects, either applicant has lost the interest in the matter or by efflux of time, the instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. 4. In view of above, the instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed. 5. However, it is open for the applicant to file recall application if cause of action still survives. October 17, 2025 AK Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Tripathi, M.N. Singh, Mahesh Narain Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rahul Srivastava, G.A., Sanjay Kumar Yadav (Sameer Jain,J.) Madan Pal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad