Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21565 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.
1. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law.
2. Learned AGA on behalf of State as well as learned counsel on behalf of respondent no. 4 appeared and vehemently opposed the instant writ petition but has no objection regarding the prayer made during the arguments.
3. Heard counsel for the respective parties and perused the record.
4. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and no objection from either of the side and in view of prayer made during the arguments, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
5. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other remedy available to him under the law.
October 29, 2025 Arti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sumit Goyal Counsel for Respondent(s) :
A.Z.Khan, G.A. (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
Salman And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad