1 / 2 2025:CGHC:19796 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 632 of 2025 1 - Raja Saluja S/o Late Pratap Singh Saluja Aged About 31 Years R/o Balbhadra Ward Bhatapara District -Balodabazar - Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - Yashwant Raj, Tehsildar, Bhatapara District- Balodabazar - Bhatapara (C.G.) (Contemnor) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 01/05/2025 1. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner arising out of order dated 20/12/2024 passed by this Court in WPC No.6260/2024. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that earlier the writ petitioner has filed an application for mutation which has been registered as Revenue Case No.202408210500024 that has not been decided by the respondent authorities, for which, the petitioner has filed a writ petition bearing WPC No. 6260/2024. SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.05.01 18:47:17 +0530 2 / 2 He submits that the said writ petition has been decided by this Court vide order dated 20/12/2024 with a direction to the Tahsildar, Bhatapar/ Respondent No.2 therein, to decide the aforesaid Revenue Case in accordance with law, as early as possible, within a period of 30 days. He submits that the revenue case has been decided by the Tahsildar, however, the mutation is not being done in respect of one of the disputed property of the petitioner. Hence, the respondents are defying the order dated 20/12/2024 passed in WPC No.6260/2024. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the documents as well as the pleadings. 4. From perusal of the order dated 20/12/2024, it appears that the writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the Tahsildar, Bhatapar/ Respondent No.2 therein to decide the aforesaid Revenue Case in accordance with law, within a period of 30 days and the same has been decided by the Tahsildar. 5. In view of the above, no case is made out to issue notice to the respondent and no contempt proceeding can be drawn against the respondent, at this juncture. 6. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum, if there is any grievance exists. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) Judge $. Bhilwar