Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194409 (ALL)

DINESH KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/35692/2025 · 2025-10-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35692 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: "(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to issue character certificate in favour of the petitioner. (ii) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to decide the online appeal filed by the petitioner bearing No.3189825106859101 dated 17.9.2025 within short stipulated period. (iii) Any other order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case." 3. It is stated that the petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Chitrakoot to consider his grievances but the respondent No.2 is not paying any heed to it. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent No.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hare Ram Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dinesh Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) raising all his grievances before the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Chitrakoot within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same in view of the guidelines laid down by this Court in bunch of writ petitions leading of which is Writ-C No.718 of 2025 (Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. & Others) within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives the representation. October 13, 2025 SS WRIC No. 35692 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad