Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1944 (CHH)

RAVINDRA RAI v. SUJIT KUMAR VISHWASH

WP227/17/2020 · 2025-01-24

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:4431 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 17 of 2020 1 - Ravindra Rai S/o Ranjit Rai Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Subhashnagar (Bhagwanpur) Police Station- Gandhinagar Tahsil- Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Sujit Kumar Vishwash S/o Late Sachin Kumar Vishwash Aged About 36 Years R/o Village- Subhashnagar (Bhagwanpur) Police Station- Gandhinagar Tahsil- Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2 - Ajit Kumar Vishwash S/o Late Sachin Vishwash Aged About 32 Years R/o Village- Subhashnagar (Bhagwanpur) Police Station- Gandhinagar Tahsil- Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Ku. Karuna Vishwash D/o Late Sachin Vishwash Aged About 30 Years R/o Village- Subhashnagar (Bhagwanpur) Police Station- Gandhinagar Tahsil- Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Sudha Vishwash W/o Late Sachin Vishwash Aged About 44 Years R/o Village- Subhashnagar (Bhagwanpur) Police Station- Gandhinagar Tahsil- Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Surguja Ambikapur Chhattisgarh 6 - Prabodh Minj S/o B.S. Minj Aged About 50 Years Occupation- Politician R/o Village- Subhashnagar (Bhagwanpur) Police Station- Gandhinagar Tahsil- Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 7 - Smt. Jyoti Sharma W/o D.K. Sharma Aged About 33 Years Occupation- -2- House Wife R/o Gandhinagar Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh 8 - Arun Kumar Dubey S/o Shri H.N. Dubey Aged About 38 Years Occupation- Business R/o Namnakala Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 9 - Nirmal Kumar Rajwade S/o Pramod Ram Rajwade Aged About 50 Years Occupation- Service (Education Department) R/o Subhashnagar Back Side Of Holly Cross Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 10 - Amarnath Singh S/o Shibu Singh Aged About 37 Years Occupation- Teacher R/o Subhashnagar Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 11 - Baijnath Yadav S/o Parasnath Yadav Aged About 37 Years Occupation- Business R/o Subhashnagar Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 12 - Smt. Munni Bai W/o Mithu Ram Rajwade Aged About 40 Years Occupation- House Wife R/o Subhashnagar Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 13 - Smt. Asha Yadav W/o Rampravesh Yadav Aged About 50 Years Occupation- House Wife R/o Godhanpur Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 14 - Smt. Sushama Sharma W/o Niraj Sharma Aged About 26 Years Occupation- House Wife R/o Subhashnagar Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 15 - Smt. Jene Vibha Minj W/o Vijay Minj Aged About 40 Years Occupation- Service R/o Subhashnagar Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate For respective respondents : Mr. Sanjeev Agrawal, Panel Lawyer and Mr. Modabbir Ansari, Advocate holding the brief of Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24.01.2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would fairly submit that the order whereby his application under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC was rejected is appealable. He seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to prefer duly constituted 3 appeal preferred before the Appellate Forum. 2. No objection from other side. 3. Permission is granted. 4. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Certified copy of the impugned order be returned after retaining its xerox copy. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha