Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19437 (GAU)

USHA ADHIKARI v. JAY SHIVANI

I.A.(Civil)/3095/2025 · 2025-09-25

Kalyan Rai Surana

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010211062025 2025:GAU-AS:13504 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3095/2025 USHA ADHIKARI W/O LATE DURGA PRASAD UPADHAYA, R/O VILL-CHAULKARA, P.O.- NIKASHI, DIST-BAKSA, BTAD, ASSAM, PIN-781372 VERSUS JAY SHIVANI THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PANJABARI, JURIPAR, GUWAHATI-37 2:BIKASH DAS THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX GUWHATI-6 3:PARAG KUMAR KAKOTI THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KAMRUP ZILLA PARISHAD GUWAHATI AMINGAON DIST-KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN-781031 4:MS. KEERTHI JALLI IAS THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-37 Page No.# 2/4 5:MR. SHIDHARTHA GOSWAMI HE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KAMRUP ZILLA PARISHAD GUWAHATI AMINGAON DIST-KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN-78103 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K R PATGIRI, MS CHITRALEKHA DAS Advocate for the Respondent : MR B DEURI, MR. K KONWAR (R-1),MR S DUTTA (R-1) Linked Case : Cont.Cas(C)/534/2023 USHA ADHIKARI W/O LATE DURGA PRASAD UPADHAYA R/O VILL-CHAULKARA P.O.-NIKASHI DIST-BAKSA BTAD ASSAM PIN-781372 VERSUS JAY SHIVANI IAS AND 2 ORS THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-37 2:BIKASH DAS THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX GUWHATI-6 3:PARAG KUMAR KAKOTI THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Page No.# 3/4 KAMRUP ZILLA PARISHAD GUWAHATI AMINGAON DIST-KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN-781031 ------------ Advocate for : MR. K R PATGIRI Advocate for : MR B DEURI ((r-2) appearing for JAY SHIVANI IAS AND 2 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 26.09.2025 Heard Mr. K.R. Patgiri, learned counsel for the applicant also heard Mr. A.K. Ghosh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. K. Konwar, learned advocate appearing for respondent no. 1. By filing this interlocutory application, the applicant who is the petitioner in the connected Cont. Cas(C) 534/2023, seeking impleadment of respondent no. 4 and 5 in the connected contempt petition. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that both the new incumbents have been put to notice of compliance of the order before vide letter dated 03.10.2024 (Annexure-‘B’). Page No.# 4/4 Accordingly, the prayer made in this interlocutory application stands allowed. Accordingly, application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant