HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 5354 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Ravindra Kumar Rastogi learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arvind Mishra learned counsel for the revenue. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition suffers from defects as the name and status of the petitioner has wrongly been described in the array of parties. He prays for permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh. 3. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed. October 13, 2025 Faraz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Kumar Rastogi, Vishakha Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) M/S Indian Enterprises .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- FARAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad