Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194324 (ALL)

RADHIKA v. KALPNATH AND ANOTHER

A227/12685/2025 · 2025-10-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12685 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed for the following relief: "i) To direct the Additional Civil Judge (J. D) Ivth, Jaunpur to decide/ expedite the suit No 1296 of 2014 Kalapnath Versus Radhika pending before him (Civil Judge (J.D) IVth, Jaunpur), within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the suit is pending since 2014 and he prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously. 4. From perusal of the order sheet, annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the petition, it appears that several dates have been fixed by the Court concerned, however, till date, the aforesaid suit has not been decided. 5. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to Civil Judge (J.D) IVth, Jaunpur, to decide the aforesaid suit, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after hearing all the concerned parties and giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case provided there is no other legal impediment. October 17, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Sevak Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Radhika .....Petitioner(s) Kalpnath And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad