Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19424 (RAJ)

ANSHU SAXENA S/O LATE SHRI SANTOSH KUMAR v. SHRI PADAMANABH SINGH S/O LATE SHRI BHAWANI SINGH

CFA/393/2023 · 2025-08-22

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33316] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 393/2023 1. Anshu Saxena S/o Late Shri Santosh Kumar, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Raj Mahal Palace Outhouse Outhouse, Sardar Patel Marg, Jaipur. 2. Somaya Saxena S/o Late Shri Santosh Kumar, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Raj Mahal Palace Outhouse Outhouse, Sardar Patel Marg, Jaipur. 3. Santosh Kumar S/o Namalum, R/o Raj Mahal Palace Outhouse Outhouse, Sardar Patel Marg, Jaipur. (Deceased During Pendency Of Suit.) ----Appellants Versus Shri Padamanabh Singh S/o Late Shri Bhawani Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o The City Palace, Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Thakur Narayan Singh, Aged 56 Years R/o City Palace, Jaipur (Deceased During Pendency Of Suit) ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. J.P. Goyal, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. Abhi Goyal Mr. Siddharth Singh Ms. Yashika Ms. Jyoti Swami Mr. Pankaj Madherna For Respondent(s) : Ms. Prishaa Singh Sisodiya, for Ramesh Chandra Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 22/08/2025 1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants with a challenge to judgment and decree dated 05.05.2023 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge No. 1, Jaipur Metropolitan II in Civil Case No. 81/2018 (629/04), whereby the [2025:RJ-JP:33316] (2 of 2) [CFA-393/2023] appellants were to vacate the subject premises within a period of two months. 2. During the pendency of the appeal, counsel for the respondent undertook not to execute the decree for vacation. 3. Today, Sr. Advocate, Mr. J.P. Goyal, assisted by Mr. Abhi Goyal appearing for the appellants submits that they would vacate the subject premises within a period of 10 days. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-decree holder has no objection if the appeal is disposed in view of the statement made by the counsel for the appellants. 5. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of in view of the statement made by counsel for the appellant, who shall now vacate the premises within a period of 10 days from today as decree for vacation would be satisfied. 6. Pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed. 7. Office is directed to send the record of the court below. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /190