IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15080 of 2024 Date of decision: 07.01.2025 Jasmer Singh. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief(s):- “i). That the respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner w.e.f. 01.04.2018 along with all consequential benefits from the due date with interest @ 12% per annum as per judgment passed in CWP No. 342/2021 titled as Yashwant Singh and others decided on 31.08.2022 (Annexure. P/4.).” 3. Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes -2- Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redresssal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 7th January, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)