Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194239 (ALL)

RAJJAN AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/27342/2016 · 2025-10-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27342 of 2016 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Learned counsel for the applicants states that he has no instruction in the matter and his clients has not been contacting to him. 2. Mr. Manoj Srivastava, Learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, on the other hand, submits that applicants are not honouring the terms and conditions of the compromise and are not paying the balance amount. 3. In these circumstances, as the Learned counsel for the applicants has no instructions in the matter and no other counsel has appeared to press the case, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution. October 13, 2025 Sachin Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Manoj Srivastava, Pawan Kumar Yadav, Vinay Kumar Pandey, Vindhyachal Singh (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Rajjan And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad