HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15472 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Suresh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Anoop Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. In view of the order which is being proposed to be passed, notices are not being issued to the fourth respondent. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner as well as the fourth respondent had applied for the post of Anganbari Karyakatri, village and post Barhat, District Ghazipur. The writ petitioner claims herself to be belonging to EWS category. According to the writ petitioner, the writ petitioner is fully eligible and qualified in all respects. However, on a complaint being raised regarding the EWS certificate of fourth respondent, the said certificate came to be cancelled and a notice was also issued, to which being aggrieved against the same, the fourth respondent preferred Writ-A No.13660 of 2025, Smt. Menaka Singh vs. State of U.P. and others, which came to be disposed on 12.09.2025. However, according to the writ petitioner, now the fourth respondent is being stated to have been selected and issued appointment order, but the petitioner's candidature has not been considered. 4. Prayer in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondent to consider the candidature of the writ petitioner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that whatever might be, a conscious decision is to be taken by the District Project Officer, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Kumar Gupta, Vashishtha Narayan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Diksha Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Ghazipur looking into the fact whether the testimonials (EWS Certificate) so submitted by the fourth respondent holds the field. He submits that let the writ petitioner approach the third respondent. 6. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 7. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.3, who shall on the said motion proceed to examine the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of three months. 8. In case, the third respondent is of the opinion that the claim is to be decided by any other authority, the papers be transmitted to the said authority with due communication to the writ petitioner. 9. It is further clarified that in case, any action is taken, which is prejudicial to the interest of the fourth respondent, then compliance of principle of natural justice be done in that regard. October 15, 2025 N.S.Rathour WRIA No. 15472 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad