CHANDRA SHEKHAR TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/29356/2025 · 2025-10-08
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194207 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 194207 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29356 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.
1. Heard Sri Vinay Bhushan Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-
"I. Issue a writ order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the respondent Bank to release the entire agreed dues pending against them. II. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding/directing to the Respondent Bank to take the appropriate decision upon the representation dated 24.1.2025 and its reminder dated 28.4.2025, pending before them since the date of institution."
3. Learned standing counsel submits that since the branch of the Bank is being shifted the claim of the petitioner can be directed to be decided by the concerned authority of the Bank, namely, respondent no. 2.
4. In the circumstances, we dispose of this petition withe a direction to the petitioner to make a representation before respondent no. 2 within a period of four weeks from today regarding his claims and in the event, he makes a representation as directed hereinabove, the said respondent no. 2 shall dispose of the same strictly in accordance with law within a further period of two months. October 9, 2025 Kirti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Tiwari, Vinay Bhushan Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Dwivedi, C.S.C. (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Chandra Shekhar Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad