Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19420 (RAJ)

BUDDHIPRAKESH @ BUDDHIRAM S/O SUKHJI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6613/2025 · 2025-06-17

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23305] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6613/2025 Buddhiprakesh @ Buddhiram S/o Sukhji, Age 38 Years, R/o Aadalwada Kalan, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwada, Haal Resident Of Kherda, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 17/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.343/2025, registered with the Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur for offences under Sections 19 and 54 of Rajasthan Excise Act. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He also submits that as per rejection order, fourteen cases are pending against the accused petitioner, out of which, in eleven cases, he has been acquitted by the competent Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody [2025:RJ-JP:23305] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6613/2025] since 24.04.2025. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and so also the allegation levelled against him and the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before the trial Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J GAURAV/148