IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8775 of 2024 Date of Decision: 08.04.2025 _______________________________________________________ Shyam Lal …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Naveen Awasthi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Since it is quite apparent from the reply filed on behalf of the respondents that petitioner has already served the department at the present place of posting for almost three years, this Court sees no reason to interfere with the impugned transfer order and as such, same is upheld. Present petition fails and dismissed accordingly. Interim order dated 27.08.2024 is hereby vacated. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 08, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?