Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AM>^V (Special Original Jurisdiction) ■ ! MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUN#^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13489 OF 2025 Between: Gurrapusala Yedukondalu, S/o. Gurrapusala Venkateswarlu, Age 43 years, R/o. 5-79-1, Obuletivari Street Podili, Podili, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Velagapudi Amaravathi Guntur District
2. The District Collector, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Joint Collector, Praksam District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Revenue Divisional officer, Kanigiri Revenue Division, Praksam District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The Thasildar, Podili, Kanigiri Revenue Division, Praksam District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of Respondent Nos. 2 and 5 in considering the representations dated 27.01.2025 may and
0' 03.03.2025, and in failing to grant an assignment patta in favour of the Petitioner for the remaining extent of Ac. 2.81 cents out of Ac.4.81 cents as per beneficiary list in Survey Nos. 1326/1 (3.62 cents) and 1325/5 (1.19 cents), Podili Village, Podili Mandal, Prakasam District, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the Respondents to grant the assignment patta in favour of the Petitioner in respect of remaining extent of Ac. 2.81 cents, as per the list of eligible beneficiaries and was allotted Ac. 4.81 cents in Survey Nos. 1326/1 (3.62 cents) and 1325/5 (1.19 cents) in Podili Village, Podili Mandal, Kanigiri Revenue Division, Prakasam District. iA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to grant assignment pattas to an extent of Ac. 2.81 cents in Survey Nos. 1326/1 and 1325/5, in Podili Village, Podili Mandal, Prakasam District by considering the representation submitted by the Petitioners dated 27.01.2025 and 03.03.2025. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI.
GAJJALA MALLIKARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order:
f APHC010270342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13489/2025 Between: Gurrapusala Yedukondalu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.GAJJALA MALLIKARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13489 of 2025
ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs;- ‘may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondent Nos. 2 and 5 in considering the representations dated 27.01.2025 and 03.03.2025 and in failing to grant an assignment patta in favour of the Petitioner for the remaining extent of Ac.2.81 cents out of Ac.4.81 cents as per beneficiary list in Survey Nos. 1326/1 (3.62 cents) and 1325/5(1 19 cents), Podili Village, Podill Mandat, Prakasam District illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the I as Respondents to grant the assignment patta in favour of the Petitioner in respect of remaining extent of Ac. 2.81 cents as per the list of eligible beneficiaries and was allotted Ac. 4.81 cents In Survey Nos. 1326/1 (3.62 cents) and 1325/5 (1.19 cents) Podill Village, Podili Mandal, Kanigiri Revenue Division Prakasam District forthwith and/or and/or pass such...” in
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending Writ Petition, the 5*^ respondent has issued rejection proceedings, dated
N
12.06.2025. Hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to challenge the rejection proceedings, dated 12.06.2025 issued by the 5*^ respondent.
4. Permission as sought for is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to challenge the rejection proceedings, dated 12.06.2025 issued by the 5‘^ respondent. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. cAi NIOHD. RAFI REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// / To,
1. One CC to Sri. Gajjala Mallikarjuna Reddy Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
3. Three CD Copies GSC V- -
HIGH COURT DATED;16/06/2025
ORDER WP.No.13489 of 2025 gT 0 5 AUG 2025 ^ ★^NMHTentSectjojiX^^ ^'5sseai£aS&^ DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS