1 2025:CGHC:19632 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 595 of 2025 1 Smt. Purnima Mahishwar W/o Shree Satish Kumar Mahishwar Aged About 48 Years Posted And Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Kotgaon, Block Gunderdehi, District Balod (C.G.) 2 Sandhya Verma W/o Shree Sandeep Kumar Verma Aged About 38 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. High School Khapri, Block Balod, District Balod (C.G.) 3 Anupama Deshmukh W/o Late Shree Dhanraj Deshmukh Aged About 55 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Sambalpur, Block Doundi-Lohara, District Balod (C.G.) 4 Prakash Kumbhkar S/o Shree Hari Ram Kumbhkar Aged About 44 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Belmand, Block Balod, District Balod (C.G.) 5 Manik Ram Pisda S/o Shree Dayalu Ram Pisda Aged About 41 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Rewati Nawagaon, Block Balod, District Balod (C.G.) JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.05.01 10:52:45 +0530 2 6 Huleshwarei Sahu D/o Shree Dev Singh Sahu Aged About 38 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Padkibhat, Block Balod, District Balod (C.G.) 7 Domendra Kumar Sahu S/o Shree Keshav Lal Sahu Aged About 43 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Sambalpur, Block Doundi- Lohara, District Balod (C.G.) 8 Yuvraj Sevta S/o Shree Gaind Singh Sevta Aged About 39 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Pandel, Block Doundi, District Balod (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 Shri Pardeshi Siddharth Komal Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 Mrs. Niharika Barik Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 Miss. Divya Umesh Mishra Director, Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Pramod Ramteke, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 30.04.2025 3 1. By the present contempt petition, the petitioner submits that by (Annexure C/1) while deciding the writ petition WPS No. 6758/ 2024, dated 21.10.2024, the writ petition was disposed of with the following observation:- “4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to respondents No. 2 & 3/competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents No.2 & 3/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the respondents No. 2 & 3 to consider the claim of petitioner on its own merits”. 2. However, the petitioner apprise the respondents on several occasions but till date the order of this Court in WPS No. 6758/2024 is not being complied with. 3. I have perused the order of this Court as well as the representation submitted by the petitioner. 4. It appears from the order in WPS No. 6758/2024, that no direction was given to the respondent to decide the representation, whereas, it was expected by the Court that the respondent no. 2 & 4 3 shall consider the same in accordance with law. Considering the circulars issued in this regard in the light of the judgment of this Court in Writ Appeal No. 261/2023 within a further period of 4 months. Hence, at this stage, it cannot be said that the respondents are violating the order of this Court in WPS No. 6758/2024, hence the petitioner is at liberty to apprise the respondents about the order of this court by reminding them about the observation in WPS No. 6758/2024 vide order dated 21.10.2024. 5. With the aforesaid liberty, the contempt case is disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Jyoti