Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:19026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2878 of 2025 1 Dr. Usha Kiran Bhagat D/o Shri Sukhram Bhagat Aged About 57 Years Occupation- Anesthesia Specialist, R/o Quarter No. 7, K.G. H. Hospital, Gopy Talkies Road Raigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya At Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Director Health Services, Directorate Of Health Services, Public Health And Family Welfare Department, Health Bhawan, Sector- 19, First Floor, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 The Collector Raigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4 The Civil Surgeon Cum Hospital Superintendent Kirodimal Government District Hospital Raigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.) 5 The Chief Medical And Health Officer Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.04.29 10:59:33 +0530
2 6 Dr. Dinesh Patel Bone Disease Specialist, Community Health Center Gharghoda District- Raigarh (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Sandeep K.Sharma, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Shri Vinay Pandey, Dy. A.G.
Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge
Order on Board 28/04/2025 Heard.
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner, is questioning the transfer order dated 21.11.2024 (Annexure P-1) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from in-charge Surgeon cum Chief Hospital Superintendent District Raigarh to Medical Specialist District Hospital District Janjgir Champa.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the only anesthesiologist posted in hospital Raigarh but despite that she has been transferred to Jangir. He further submits that the petitioner has also submitted a representation before the Director, health Services vide Anenxure P-4 dated 07.04.2025 but till date the same has not been decided.
3. Learned State counsel submits that if the representation of the petitioner is still pending, the same will be considered and decided within a stipulated period.
3
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents.
5. Considering the submission made by the learned State counsel, at this juncture, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-4), in accordance with law, within a period of 40 days from today.
6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands
disposed off. Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru)
JUDGE Jyoti