Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12387 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"To direct the Civil Judge (Junior Division-4), Gorakhpur to decide the Application under order 39 Rule 1 & 2 C.P.C. (paper No.7C) filed in Case No.1360/2025 (Rajkumar Pandey Vs. Ramanand and others) within a specified time as fixed by this Humble Court."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (7C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division-4), Gorakhpur to consider and decide the interim injunction application (7C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Raj Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Ramanand Pandey And 12 Others .....Respondent(s)
within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 13, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 12387 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad