Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19414 (AP)

VARADI SITHA RAM BABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/4271/2020 · 2025-07-17

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010271332020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4271/2020 Between: 1. VARADI SITHA RAM BABU, VARADI SITHA RAM BABU S/O SATYAM, AGE 45 YEARS, CASTE VADABALIJA, R/O DTR ENCLAVE, PITHAPURAM COLONY, VISHAKAPATNAM. 2. VARADI RATNAMMA, W/O SITHA RAM BABU, AGE 40 YEARS, CASTE VADABALIJA, R/O DTR ENCLAVE, PITHAPURAM COLONY, VISHAKAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, The State of Andhra Pradesh through S.H.O., Women P.S.,Vishakapatnam City, rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioners in SC No. 59 of 2017 pending on the file of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the Proceedings in SC No. 59 of 2017 on the file of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam IA NO: 2 OF 2020 2 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the Petitioners in proceedings in SC No. 59 of 2017 on the file of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the above criminal Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4271/2020 ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed, by the Petitioner/Accused Nos.2 and 3, seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in S.C.No.59 of 2017 on the file of the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. 2. Despite the matter is being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none represented for the Petitioners. 3. The proceeding sheet dated 16.07.2025 also shows, there was no representation. 4. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State/Respondent is in attendance. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 18.07.2025 SCS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4271/2020 Dated.18.07.2025 SCS 124