HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3792 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. List revised. None appeared for the applicant. 2. Sole opposite party has filed an affidavit of compliance, which is taken on record. 3. Office is directed to proceed accordingly. 4. Learned Standing Counsel representing the sole opposite party states that salary and arrears have been paid to the applicant in compliance of the order dated 29.4.2025. He has laid emphasis on paragraphs 8 and 9 of the compliance affidavit and annexure CA-1 to the compliance affidavit. It is further submitted that now no cause of action survives to maintain the contempt application; therefore, same may be dismissed as infructuous. 5. As such, the instant contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. October 14, 2025 P.P. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : R. K. Singh Kaosik Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Arvind Singh .....Applicant(s) Rakesh Kumar .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- POONAM PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad