BISHAMBAR DASS (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS v. DR. GURBAKSH CHAUDHARY
CR/613/2025 · 2025-01-31
Suvir Sehgal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19413 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19413 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CR-613-2025
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (118)
CR-613-2025 Date of decision:- 31.01.2025
Bishambar Dass (since deceased) through LRs ...Petitioner
Versus Dr. Gurbaksh Chaudhary
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Rai Singh Chauhan, Advocate, with Mr. Rohit Sapehiya, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amar Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate, with Ms. Sanchi Bindra, Advocate for the caveator-respondent.
…
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)
1. Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India inter alia for quashing order dated 04.01.2025, Annexure P-6, passed by the learned Rent Controller, Pathankot, by which the application for stay of dispossession, during the pendency of the application/proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13, CPC, for setting aside ex parte order of eviction dated 13.03.2015, Annexure P-2, has been declined.
2. At the outset, counsel for the caveator-respondent states that possession of the tenanted portion has been taken in execution on 28.01.2025.
PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.02.03 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
CR-613-2025
-2-
3. Faced with this development, counsel for the petitioner states that the instant revision petition has become infructuous.
4. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(SUVIR SEHGAL)
JUDGE 31.01.2025 Pardeep
Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.02.03 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.