Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194100 (ALL)

TILLU @ AVANEET v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/22724/2025 · 2025-10-06

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22724 of 2025 Court No. - 43 HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J. HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the A.G.A. representing the respondent No. 1 and 2. The present petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 22.09.2025 lodged by respondent No.3 against the petitioners in Case Crime No. 413 of 2025 under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 125 & 109 Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023 & 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 at Police Station Sikandrarau, District Hathras (Annexure-1 to the writ petition). ii). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of the mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in Case Crime No. 413 of 2025 under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351 (3), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 125 & 109 Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023 & 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 at Police Station Sikandrarau, District Hathras." A perusal of the First Information Report discloses commission of cognizable offence in the above case. In view of the aforesaid, no case for quashing the first Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anjali Singh Tomer, Gaurav Singh Tomar, Inder Pal Singh Tomar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Tillu @ Avaneet .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) information report is made out. For the aforesaid reason, the present writ petition is dismissed. October 7, 2025 Vipasha CRLP No. 22724 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Salil Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIPASHA MUKHERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad