[2025:RJ-JP:22283-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 540/2025 in S. B. Writ Petition No.3349/2025 M/s T.p (Tata Power) Bikaner Iii Neemrana Ii Transmission Limited, (Formerly Known As Bikaner Iii Neemrana Transmission Limited), Having Registered Office At Flat No 94, 3Rd Floor, Pocket 4, Lig Flats, Sector 11, Dwarka, New Delhi-110075, Corporate Office Shatabdi Bhavan, B12 And 13, Sector 4, Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201301. ----Appellant Versus 1. Bihari Lal S/o Kurada Ram, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Ward No 1, Padewa, Tehsil Khetri, Distt- Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) 2. Project Manager, Tata Power Solar Systems Limited, Karni Kripa, Lalgarh Palace Premises, Bikaner, Rajasthan 334001 3. Union Of India, Through Its Secretary Of The Government Of India, Ministry Of Power, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi. 110001. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its District Collector And Magistrate, District- Jhunjhunu (Raj). 5. The District Collector And Magistrate, District- Neem Ka Thana. (District As And When Exists). 6. The Sub Divisional Officer, Khetri, Distt-Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 7. Tehsildar, Tehsil- Khetri, Distt- Jhunjhunu (Raj). ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. J. P. Goyal, Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Meenal Bhargava, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Bhati, Advocate. Mr. Neeraj Batra, Advocate. Mr. Rohitash Kumar Saini, Advocate. [2025:RJ-JP:22283-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-540/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 27/05/2025 Heard. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 apprehends that the appellant will not pay the compensation to him for installation of transmission line as required under the law. Counsel further submits that as per his estimate, the amount of compensation comes to rupees five lakhs. Learned senior counsel for the appellant submits that compensation for the land has already been determined by the competent authority which comes to rupees two lakhs thirty-three thousand nine hundred twenty seven. Counsel further submits that the demand draft of the aforesaid amount has already been handed over to the counsel for the respondent no.1. Photocopy of the same is taken on record. Respondent no.1 is at liberty to challenge the said determination of compensation order in accordance with law before the competent authority if he so desires. In that view of the matter, we set aside the order dated 07.03.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/169