- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21158 RFA No. 1250 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1250 OF 2019 (MON) BETWEEN: SRI. CHANNAKRISHNAPPA S/O. LATE ANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT HURALAGURKI, VENKATAGIRIKOTE POST, VIJAYAPURA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562 110. BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR.V., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SRI. T.MURTHY S/O LATE THIMMAIAH, C/O SULTANPALYA (NO.2379), 7/2, S.R.NAIK LEGACY, DEVEGOWDA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 032. …RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI, RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 96 OF THE CPC. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21158 RFA No. 1250 of 2019 ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 30.10.2024, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. The appeal is listed today. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in 2019. Now we are in the month of June, 2025. The appeal is pending from almost six years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28