IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SR] JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5662 OF 2025 Between : syed Bashi (SYED BASHl ) @ Shaik Jani Basha, S/o Dhariyavali, Age: 23 years, R/o 23-8, Pasuvula Hospital Bazar VTC, Vinukonda Post, Painadu District, A.P (A16) . . . Petitioner/Accused 16 I AND The State of Andhra Prad`6'sh, Through SHO, VI'nukOnda PS, Palnadu District, Rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. ...Respondent/Complainant . Petition under Section 482 of BNSS, is filed praying that in the cI'rCumStanCeS Stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant the Anticipa{ory Bail to the petitioner/ Accused No.16 in FIR No. 304 of 2024, dated: 29-12-2024 P.S Vinukonda, Palnadu District. The petition coming on for 'hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof aild upon hearing the arguments of sri shaik Karimulla, Advocate for the '\F6titioner and of public prosecutor for Respondent, the Court made the following APHCO10272262025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENllVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5662 OF 2025 [3327] Between: 1.SYED BASHl(SYED BASHI ) @ SHAIK JANI BASHA, DHARIYAVALl, AGE 23 YEARS, R/O 23-8-, PIASUVULA HOSPITAL BAZAR VTC, VINUKONDA POST, PAINADU DISTRICT, A.P (A16) .HPETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Through SHO, Vinukonda PS, Painadu District, Rep. By its Public Prosecutor High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to grant the Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner/ Accused No.16 in FIR No. 304 of 2024, dated: 29-12-2024 P.S Vinukonda, Palnadu District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.SHAIK KARIMULLA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5662 OF 2025 ORDER: The Criminal PetI'tiOn, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is filed on behalf'of the petitioner/.accused No.16 to grant anticipatory bail in connection with crime No.'3O4/2024 of Vinukonda Police Station, Palnadu District. 2. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner and others for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 452, 506, 324, 435 read with 149 oil.P.C- 3. Case of the prosecution in brief, is that, the defacto complainant is a TDP activist and the petitioner and his members related to ycp party. on 10.7.2022 at about 8.00 pm at the house of the defac{o complainant, the accused, along with others, formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and criminally trespassed into defacto complainant's house and beat him, his family members wl'th iron rods, sticks etc. The accused poured petrol on the bullet bikes of the defacto complainant and set fire to them, as a result of which they were burnt. They threatened him to change the party from TDP to YCP and warned that they would kill him if it is not done. The defacto complainant and his family members sustained injuries. As the accusecl have been intimidating the defacto complainant, he stayed in Chilakaluripet at the €=.`1 'q3f :---`l house of hI-S mother I'n law a~nd on the advI'Ce Of the elders, he came to police station and gave a report on 29.12.2024 at 5:00pm. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petjtjoner and learned Assistant publI-C prosecutor for respondent-state. perused the record. 5, Learned Assistant public prosecutor submits that the court may pass appropriate Orders. 6. A perusal of the material available on record goes to show that the present complaint has been filed on the alleged incident that took place 21/2 years back I'.e., On 10.7.2022. Even as per the accusations and contents of the F.I.R., no specI-Tic act has been attrjbu{ed to attract offence under sectI|On 452 of lPC as aga]'nst the petitioner herein. In vl-ew of the aforesaid facts and , circumstances of the case, this court is inclined {o consider the prayer of the Petitioner for grant of an{icipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, jn the event of his arrest wI'th regard to this crime, petitioner/A16 shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satl'sfaction of the arresting police officials and also on condition that the petitioner shall make himself available for investigation as and when required and that he shall not cause any threat, inducement or Promise tO the Prosecution Witnesses. L_ The petitioner shall appear before the station House Officer concerned, once in a week i.e. on every sunday between 10.00 am and 05.00 pm, till fill-ng Of the Charge-sheet. 8. AccordI-ngly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. SD/- M.SRINIVAS //TRUE COPY// ASSISTAN ISTRAR OFFICER To, 1. The Station House Officer, Vinukonda Police Station, Vinukonda Town, Palnadu District. 2. One CC to Sri Shaik Karimuiia, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two cos toPUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HI-gh Court of A.P., Amaravati.[OUT] 4. One spare copy. PSD HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED : 30/06/2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5662 of 2025 ALLOWED