Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194035 (ALL)

ONKAR NATH AND 2 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 18 OTHER

WRIC/27764/2025 · 2025-10-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 27764 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned standing counsel for respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following principal reliefs:- "1). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the state authority to provide adequate security to the petitioners at the time of ploughing on his land Khata No. 2 (Old No. 2) situated at Kolha, Tappa Upraudh, Pargana Kantit, Tehsil Lalganj, District Mirzapur. 2). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the police authority to take appropriate action against the private respondents, who terrorized the petitioners at the time of ploughing. 3). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 15.11.2024 (Annexure No. 9) pending before him within specific period." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that for redressal of their grievance, petitioners have filed representation dated 15.11.2024 before respondent No. 2, but till date no decision has been taken. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Shahanshah Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Onkar Nath And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 18 Other .....Respondent(s) aforesaid representation within a stipulated time, for which learned standing counsel has no objection. 4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 15.11.2024 in accordance with law maximum within period of one month from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. October 28, 2025 A.K.Srivastava WRIC No. 27764 of 2025 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad