Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194013 (ALL)

ISHAAN v. AUTHORIZED OFFICER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

WRIC/36325/2025 · 2025-10-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36325 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ramesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the bank. 2. Proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner under the SARFASI Act. 3. At present, the respondent bank is claiming Rs. 82,66,315.87/- from the petitioner. 4. The petitioner is not in a position to repay the same. 5. On such statement, learned counsel for the petitioner prays, he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to pursue his statutory remedy. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. October 17, 2025 Abhilash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sahab Tiwari (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Ishaan .....Petitioner(s) Authorized Officer, Central Bank Of India And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ABHILASH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad