Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19401 (AP)

KANDULA JAYA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/17893/2020 · 2025-09-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010271272020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17893/2020 Between: 1. KANDULA JAYA RAO, S/O KRISHNA SWATNY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT APPAPURAM VILLAGE, NADCNDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVTHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET DIVISION, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NADENDLA POLICE STATION, NADENDLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, , NADENDLA POLICE STATION, NADENDLA GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. KANDULA CHALAPATHI RAO, S/O KRISHNA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O APPAPURAM VILLAGE, NADENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. NAIDU ADI SESHA RAO, S/O NAGESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O APPAPURAM VILLAGE, NADENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent herein trying to settle the civil disputes at the instance of the 6th and 7th respondents herein without considering civil suits in O S No 453/2015 and 0 S No 364/2015 on the file of the court of Senior Civil Judge Narasaraopet Guntur district is illegal arbitrary and violative of Principals of natural justice and consequently direct the 5th respondent herein not to interfere with the civil disputes forthwith…” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to Costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 02.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17893 of 2020 Dated.02.09.2025 ASR