Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 194006 (ALL)

M/S QAMARE ALAM, CONTRACTOR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/35486/2025 · 2025-10-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35486 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1, Sri Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for respondent No. 2. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "I) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to release the work amount sum of Rs. 99120.00 to the petitioner with interest from due date in pursuant to the contract work done by the petitioner. II). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents, especially respondent no. 2 to decide the representation dated 27.09.2025 within stipulated time." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed representation dated 27.09.2025 before respondent No. 2, but till date no decision has been taken. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid representation within a stipulated time, for which learned counsel for respondents have no objection. 4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 27.09.2025 in accordance with law maximum within period of six weeks from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kesari, Vindeshwari Prasad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Digvijay Singh, Harsh Vardhan Gupta M/S Qamare Alam, Contractor .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. October 17, 2025 ADY WRIC No. 35486 of 2025 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad