VIMAL CHANDRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
CRLRD/569/2024 · 2025-10-12
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193979 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 193979 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 569 of 2024 Court No. - 90 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.
1. Learned counsel for the revisionists has stated at the Bar that this revision has become infructuous and may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the revisionists, the instant revision is dismissed as infructuous.
3. Subject to the observations made above, this revision is consigned to record.
(Harvir Singh,J.) . October 13, 2025 Faridul Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Santosh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Istyak Khan
Vimal Chandra And Another .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad