Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19397 (GAU)

RAJIB SINGHA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2268/2025 · 2025-09-18

Pranjal Das

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010208912025 2025:GAU-AS:13035 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2268/2025 RAJIB SINGHA S/O GAUTAM SINGHA R/O ALISINGA URIAMGURI, ALI SINGHA URIAMGURI, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM PIN CODE- 784025 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHOWDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 19.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. B. Chowdhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. Perused the last order dated 18.09.2025. Page No.# 2/2 3. The report was called for regarding registration of any case against the petitioner in the Tezpur P.S. 4. Pursuant thereof, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has submitted a report stating that no case has been registered against the petitioner in the Tezpur P.S. 5. In view of the same, there is no legal basis for any apprehension of arrest. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that SI, Mr. P. Pegu from Borghat, Police Outpost under Tezpur P.S has been harassing the petitioner. 6. The police are at liberty to proceed as per law in case of any allegations of a criminal act on the part of the petitioner. However, as stated above, a written report has been submitted by the police from the said police station that no case is pending against him at the moment, in that P.S. 7. The petitioner shall not be subjected to any undue harassment. 8. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms. JUDGE Comparing Assistant