IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 WRIT PETITION NO. 6038 OF 2024 NARAYAN SITARAM KADU AND OTHERS VERSUS THE DIVISIONAL REGISTRAR MONEY LENDING AND OTHERS Mr. S. S. Kote, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. N. D. Raut, AGP for the Respondent/State Mr. R. R. Karpe, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 12th SEPTEMBER, 2025 P.C. :- 1. Learned Counsel for the Respondents has raised objection with regard to the maintainability of the Petition on the ground that alternate remedy to file Revision under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 is available for the Petitioners to challenge the impugned order. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the Petition with liberty to file Revision under Section 9 of the Act. He undertakes to file Revision within a period of six weeks from today. 3. In view of this, Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. In case the Revision is filed within a period of six weeks from today, the issue of limitation shall neither be raised nor be 927 WP 6038.2024.odt 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:24481 entertainable. 4. Interim relief granted earlier to continue till eight (08) weeks from today. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 927 WP 6038.2024.odt 2 of 2